#1 Overall Winner
Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027)
- Extra-long wired range: 3.5m coiled cable plus 2m extension for longer-distance TV/PC listening.
Comparison
The Avantree HF027 and Avantree HF039 are both wired, long-range 3.5mm headphones aimed at TV and PC listening from across the room. HF027 scores higher overall thanks to strong compatibility/connectivity, value, and a practical extension-cable approach, while HF039 stands out for over-ear comfort and convenient inline volume (plus stereo/mono control). If durability is your top concern, the scoring and reviews lean toward HF027; if comfort and TV-friendly controls matter most, HF039 is compelling.
#1 Overall Winner
Contender
Pick the Avantree HF027 if you want long-cord in-ear earbuds with an extension cable, broad 3.5mm audio-out compatibility, and stronger overall scoring for value and durability.
Pick the Avantree HF039 if you prefer cushioned over-ear comfort, want easy inline volume control for TV watching, or need stereo/mono control—while accepting higher durability risk based on review patterns and scoring.
Overall winner
Depends on your needs
| Feature | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) | Avantree HF039 Long Coiled Cord Over-Ear Headphones | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type / fit | In-ear wired earbuds | Over-ear wired headphones | Depends |
| Cable length approach | 3.5m coiled + 2m extension | 5m coiled cord | Tie |
| Primary controls | Call control; mic on cable | Inline volume control; stereo/mono control | Avantree HF039 Long Coiled Cord Over-Ear Headphones |
| Sound isolation (noise control) | Sound isolation (in-ear tips) | Sound isolation (over-ear pads) | Tie |
| Audio quality score (provided) | 75 | 78 | Avantree HF039 Long Coiled Cord Over-Ear Headphones |
| Performance score (provided) | 74 | 74 | Tie |
| Usability score (provided) | 73 | 82 | Avantree HF039 Long Coiled Cord Over-Ear Headphones |
| Build quality score (provided) | 68 | 45 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
| Reliability score (provided) | 58 | 42 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
| Durability score (provided) | 60 | 36 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
| Compatibility score (provided) | 90 | 80 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
| Setup score (provided) | 84 | 90 | Avantree HF039 Long Coiled Cord Over-Ear Headphones |
| Portability score (provided) | 71 | 62 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
| Customer satisfaction score (provided) | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| Overall score (provided) | 76 | 68 | Avantree Long Cord Earbuds for TV & PC (HF027) |
For real-world TV and PC listening, both models are positioned to deliver clear, isolated sound without wireless dropouts because they’re wired. In the provided scores, overall performance is tied, but HF039 rates slightly higher for audio quality, helped by its over-ear design and stated 40mm drivers. HF027 performs well for everyday listening and is commonly described as clear, but feedback varies—some users praise “crystal clear” sound while at least one review calls it muffled. Practically, performance will often come down to whether you prefer in-ear isolation (HF027) or over-ear comfort (HF039) during longer sessions.
Reliability is mixed for both, but the failure modes differ. HF027 has reports of issues like an earbud not working or extension/connector trouble causing dropouts, which is reflected in a middling reliability score. HF039’s reliability and durability scores are lower, and reviews repeatedly point to physical breakage at the arm/earcup joint after months (or even weeks) of use. If you want the option with fewer repeated physical-failure complaints, HF027 is the safer bet based on the provided data.
HF039 rates higher for usability in the provided scoring, and that aligns with its over-ear fit and easy-to-reach inline volume control. For many TV viewers, not having to insert earbuds—and being able to change volume quickly—reduces friction. HF027 can be very usable in desk and office scenarios due to its long reach and coiled cable, but usability feedback is more mixed because earbud fit can vary and the cable weight/clip usage can affect how stable it feels during movement.
HF027 is a lightweight, in-ear design aimed at staying out of the way, with silicone tips and a clip to help prevent the cable from pulling the earbuds loose. HF039 is a traditional over-ear design with padded ear cups and an adjustable headband, intended for comfort over long sessions and for users who don’t like in-ear tips. The better design depends on your preference: minimal in-ear versus cushioned over-ear with easier on-cable controls.
Build quality is a key separator. HF027 scores higher for build quality and durability overall, though it still has mixed reliability feedback (including reports of connector/extension issues). HF039 has a notably lower build quality score, and multiple reviews describe breakage where the adjustable arm meets the ear covering—suggesting a stress point in the design. If you expect frequent use and want to minimize the risk of physical failure, HF027 looks safer on the provided data.
Durability strongly favors HF027 in the provided scoring. HF039’s durability concerns are consistent across multiple reviews, especially breakage where the arm connects near the ear covering. HF027 isn’t immune to issues—some users mention cable/connector problems or tangling—but the pattern for HF039 suggests a more structural durability risk for frequent users.
HF027 is easier to carry and store because it’s an in-ear design, and the scoring reflects better portability. HF039’s over-ear frame and long coiled cable make it more “leave it by the TV/desk” friendly than truly portable. If you plan to move your headphones between rooms or travel with them, HF027 is the more practical option.
HF027’s feature set focuses on flexibility: it includes a long coiled cable plus a separate extension cable, spare ear tips, a clip, and an on-cable microphone/call control. HF039’s features focus on TV convenience, including inline volume control and stereo/mono control alongside the long coiled cable and clip. If you want mic support and modular cable options, HF027 has the advantage; if you want fast volume changes while watching TV (and the option to switch to mono), HF039 is the more purpose-built feature set.
Setup is simple for both: plug into a compatible 3.5mm audio-out port and start listening. HF039 scores slightly higher for setup, likely because it’s a single long coiled cable with inline volume control (no extension decision). HF027 may require connecting the extension depending on your distance needs, and some owners report extension/connector finickiness over time. For first-time TV headphone buyers who want the most straightforward wired setup, HF039 has a small edge.
Both products are designed for devices with a 3.5mm jack, including TV and PC use. HF027 scores higher for compatibility and is very explicit about being for a 3.5mm audio output jack (often labeled AUX out/Audio out). HF039 lists broad compatibility across common devices and is frequently used successfully with TVs and computers in reviews. If you want the more strongly scored “fits the most setups” option, HF027 leads.
Both products are repeatedly described as delivering good sound for TV and everyday listening, with sound isolation to reduce distractions. In the provided scoring, HF039 edges HF027 on audio quality. Reviews for HF039 often mention clarity and being able to hear TV content clearly, while HF027 reviews frequently praise clear sound but include at least one strong negative complaint about muffled audio. If audio quality is your only deciding factor, the scoring and review balance slightly favor HF039, though individual fit (especially with in-ear tips) can influence perceived sound.
Connectivity is straightforward for both: they are wired 3.5mm headphones intended for devices with an AUX/audio-out port. HF027 scores higher for connectivity and compatibility, and it’s explicitly positioned as working with 3.5mm audio output jacks (a useful callout for TV buyers). HF039 also targets 3.5mm AUX use and is commonly reviewed as plug-and-play for TVs. If you’re comparing purely on wired compatibility confidence, HF027 has the edge in the provided scoring.
Both products are widely described as good value in reviews, and both have the same star rating (4.3/5) across thousands of ratings. In the provided scoring, HF027 rates higher for value, helped by strong compatibility/connectivity scoring and included accessories (extension, spare tips, clip, mic). HF039 can still be good value if its over-ear comfort and inline volume control are exactly what you need, but durability complaints can undermine its long-term value for heavy users.
Both products come from the same brand (Avantree), and both show strong customer satisfaction scoring. Reviews for HF039 include positive mentions of customer service, which can build confidence, while HF027 also has positive quality/value feedback. With the data provided, brand trust is broadly similar—though HF027’s higher overall and support scoring suggests a slightly safer purchase experience on paper.
This is effectively a tie in the provided scoring: both show strong customer satisfaction. Both hold a 4.3/5 rating with high review counts, and reviewers frequently praise sound quality and the usefulness of long coiled cables for TV listening. The difference is in the negative themes: HF027 has mixed feedback on comfort/fit and occasional reliability problems; HF039 has more consistent complaints centered on physical durability (breakage at the arm/earcup area).
Warranty/support scoring is stronger for HF027 than HF039 in the provided data. Review text for HF039 includes explicit praise for customer service experiences, but the scoring still indicates weaker support confidence compared to HF027. Since warranty terms aren’t provided, the safest takeaway is to verify the seller/manufacturer support and return window for either model before buying—especially given the durability concerns raised for HF039.
If you want the best all-around option based on the provided scoring, the Avantree HF027 is the stronger pick overall (76 vs 68). It combines an extra-long wired setup with high compatibility/value scoring and fewer durability red flags than its over-ear sibling.
The Avantree HF039 remains a smart choice for a specific buyer: someone who prioritizes over-ear comfort, wants volume control on the cable, and may benefit from stereo/mono control for TV listening. The trade-off is that its durability concerns show up repeatedly in reviews and in the lower durability/reliability scoring. If you’re an occasional user, HF039’s comfort and controls can outweigh that risk; for frequent use, HF027 is the safer bet.
Overall winner
Depends on your needs
Based on the provided scoring, the Avantree HF027 ranks higher overall (76 vs 68). It scores particularly well for connectivity/compatibility, feature usefulness for long-distance wired listening, and value. The HF039 still makes sense if you want an over-ear fit with an inline volume control and stereo/mono switching, but durability is a bigger repeated concern in reviews.
Comfort tends to favor the Avantree HF039 because it’s an over-ear design with soft padded ear pieces and an adjustable headband, and reviews frequently call it comfortable for extended use. The HF027 can be comfortable for some, but comfort/fit is more mixed, with some users reporting the in-ear tips can hurt or won’t stay secure without using the included clip.
Both are designed for long-distance listening, but they get there differently. The HF039 is specified with a 5m/16.4ft coiled cord. The HF027 combines a 3.5m coiled cable with an extra 2m extension. If you prefer a single long coiled cable, HF039 is simpler; if you like the flexibility of using an extension, HF027 offers that option.
Neither is perfect, but the main risk differs. The HF039 has a clear pattern of durability complaints, with multiple customers reporting breakage where the arm meets the ear covering. The HF027 has mixed reliability feedback too, including reports of a dead earbud or extension/connector issues. In the provided scoring, HF027 rates higher for reliability and durability than HF039.
The HF039 is the better match if you want on-cable volume control while watching TV, since this is a highlighted feature and repeatedly praised in reviews. It also lists stereo/mono control. The HF027 focuses more on call control and includes a microphone, which can be useful for PC calls, but it’s not positioned as strongly around TV volume adjustments.
Yes. Both are wired models with a 3.5mm jack and are described as compatible with devices that have a 3.5mm audio output. The HF027 description explicitly cautions that it is only compatible with a 3.5mm audio output (often labeled AUX out or Audio out). As always, it’s worth checking your TV’s port labeling before buying.
The Avantree HF039 is the better choice if you prefer not to insert earbuds. Multiple reviews mention buying it specifically because they wanted TV listening without having to “stick” anything in their ears, and they describe the padded over-ear fit as comfortable. The HF027 is an in-ear model, and comfort and fit feedback is more mixed.
Both products are commonly described as good value, but the provided scoring gives the edge to the HF027 for value. It also earns strong marks for the practical extras included (extension cable, clip, spare tips, mic) and broad 3.5mm compatibility. The HF039 can still be good value if you specifically want its over-ear comfort and inline volume control, but durability complaints can reduce long-term value.
Both are wired and straightforward, but the scoring favors the HF039 for setup. In practice, each is a plug-in solution for a 3.5mm audio-out port. The HF027 can involve an extra step if you choose to use the extension cable, while HF039 is a single long coiled cable with inline controls. Checking that your device has the correct audio output port is the key step for either.
Check our rankings and expert guides to find the best electronics products for your goals.